The case for inflation

The following are responses that Richard Maybury gave in an interview with Investor Insight.

He makes a case for the coming of a great inflation. We haven’t seen the beginning yet as we are still going through a process of de-leveraging.

–Article–

Obama is a boomer, and I think an understanding of the boomers is a valuable tool for seeing what is coming. Boomers were raised in government-controlled schools and colleges where they were taught Keynesian and socialist economics. Neither Keynesianism nor socialism contains the concept of malinvestment, meaning the distortions caused by the government injecting massive money into the economy. These two forces, the injection effect and malinvestment, are the foundation of the economic crisis, and I’ve never heard Mr. Obama or his advisors say anything about them.

Money responds to the law of supply and demand just as everything else does. When the supply of dollars goes up, the value of each individual dollar falls, and prices rise to compensate. That’s inflation. Inflation isn’t rising prices. Inflating the money supply causes rising prices.

As prices rise, people become poorer and they demand relief. The politicians stop injecting money, people have less to spend, and business slows down, often causing a recession. The shakeout can be very painful, depending on how long the inflation has lasted and how many new dollars have been injected into the economy.

The government has only two ways to finance its spending — taxes, and printing money. Seven years ago the White House and Congress decided to finance the war by printing dollars instead of raising taxes. According to the St. Louis Federal Reserve’s MZM measure of money supply, the number of dollars circulating in the US on 9-11 was $5.3 trillion, and now it’s $8.7 trillion.

What is generally overlooked is the fact that the Federal Reserve has been inflating the money supply almost without pause ever since the Fed was created 94 years ago. So, underpinning the most recent seven years of injections and malinvestment, we have the residual from the previous 87 years.

Remember that I said events will control Obama much more than Obama will control events. Ever since the Great Depression, the way the federal government has dealt with shakeouts has been by re-inflating. They halt recessions by expanding the money supply further, which stops the shakeout. But that leaves a lot of bad investments in place, and it also creates a lot more. Of course, the so-called rescue pushes the day of reckoning into the future.

The interview continues and he mentions that eventually as the reserve currency the United States will have to do something to regain support of the dollar. He proposes this will be done through a return to the dollar being backed by some basket of currencies. Something will have to be done if the dollar isn’t to be completely destroyed. The entire interview is worth the read. Here it is: Interview.

3 thoughts on “The case for inflation

  1. Well-written article, but Obama is not a Boomer. Hopefully you are open to allowing your readers to see an alternative view in comments on this blog: Obama’s membership in Generation Jones (between the Boomers and Generation X). I’ve seen numerous very credible experts say recently that Obama is part of GenJones; if Obama’s generational identity is of interest to you, click this link…it goes to a page filled with lots of articles and videos of many famous people discussing Obama’s identity as a GenJoneser, and the many implications of this for his Presidency: http://www.generationjones.com/2008election.html

  2. Well-written article, but Obama is not a Boomer. Hopefully you are open to allowing your readers to see an alternative view in comments on this blog: Obama’s membership in Generation Jones (between the Boomers and Generation X). I’ve seen numerous very credible experts say recently that Obama is part of GenJones; if Obama’s generational identity is of interest to you, click this link…it goes to a page filled with lots of articles and videos of many famous people discussing Obama’s identity as a GenJoneser, and the many implications of this for his Presidency: http://www.generationjones.com/2008election.html

  3. Well-written article, but Obama is not a Boomer. Hopefully you are open to allowing your readers to see an alternative view in comments on this blog: Obama’s membership in Generation Jones (between the Boomers and Generation X). I’ve seen numerous very credible experts say recently that Obama is part of GenJones; if Obama’s generational identity is of interest to you, click this link…it goes to a page filled with lots of articles and videos of many famous people discussing Obama’s identity as a GenJoneser, and the many implications of this for his Presidency: http://www.generationjones.com/2008election.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>