Tag Archives: economy

The Road Ahead…

Posted on by
Reply

I’m going to be writing a new section that will deal with the road ahead. As far as I can see it will be fraught with potholes, obstacles, and unforeseen objects that will make our journeys difficult.

When I say that we (you, I, and everyone else) ought to have 6 months to a years worth of food on hand I’m not saying this as a survivalist or a fear stricken lad. We are at a juncture.

The juncture mainly consists of a failing global monetary system and an overexploited Earth. Global warming may be a real issue, but one doesn’t need to go down that road to see all the other red flashing warning signs that state simply:

WARNING: Cheap energy is about all used up. Expansion, growth, and prosperity were due to cheap energy. Without this life will be VERY different. I repeat WARNING.

Don’t get me wrong, with this changing future there will be plenty of opportunities, but don’t expect it to be filled with the incessant need for more things. Sure we may have the need for more things, but they will be things of need not things of excess.  Our “golden age” has ended.  We have lived off the surplus’s of the East for long enough, and all we have to show is a massive debt, and deteriorating economy, which will have far reaching implications.

Look for a new section that deals with the road ahead and preparing for it.  I hope you are mentally prepared for a transition.  Neither you nor I knows exactly what it will look like, however I can place various ideas on a gradient with two extremes.  

On that…

Congressional Budget Outlook :: CBO

Posted on by
Reply

Hold your hats folks as here are some of the forecasts for 2009 (link):

  • GDP falling by 2.2%
  • Slow recovery in 2010
  • > 9% unemployment by 2010
  • Decline in inflation (hmmmm… if monetary policy says anything this will reverse or at least eventually destroy the dollar)
  • Continued decline in housing prices
  • Decline in real consumption of more than 1%
  • Indeterminate on the financial system

And the best of all

$1.2 trillion dollar budget deficit for 2009*

*That doesn’t include the proposed stimulus package
*That amounts to 8.3% of GDP

So, we have an economy in decline, and digging a deeper and deeper hole to climb out of.  What I really want to know is how are we going to pay for 1) a 1.2T dollar deficit, and 2) a large fiscal stimulus package of a indeterminate size.

Let’s see our foreign friends have been purchasing our debt, which enabled us to essentially live off of their productive labor.  China for example is seeing a marjor reduction in exports, its economy is contracting, and eventually it is going to have to decide if it is worth supporting the American lifestyle at their own expense.  Presently, everyone is so intertwined I think there is a fear that if one jumps the house of cards falls down and we all lose.  However, is it possible for say China to pull out of the house of cards with minimal damage?  Is there a way they can reduce their exposure to US debt, and not have their savings collapse?  This is something I’d really like to know.

Seems to me that if they slowly shift some of their dollar reserves into commodities and other currencies SLOWLY, especially when there is increased demand they will be able to lessen their exposure.  The US import market is tanking, and has been tanking.  With unemployment increasing Bloomberg people are going to have a smaller income and will be forces to save thus hurting exporting countries.  This isn’t a US phenomena alone as Europe and frankly the rest of the world is contracting simultaneously, while being fed a mouthful of credit from central banks to re-inflate the bubble.  Last I checked it is very difficult to inflate a popped bubble.

Let’s take the latest number from Taiwan Bloomberg.  Their exports dropped by a record 41.9%.  We all know that Taiwan exports electronics, which have been a major boon ever since the technological revolution, which also saw a major hiccuup in 2000-2003.  So, this is confirmation of a major exporting taking a major hit.  There will be ramifications for the Taiwanese economy.

I can’t imagine that after the dust settles the world’s economies will look the same.  The sea of money will shift to where is sees the most opportunity and in its movement will tear apart the economies of many.

Here are a few more headlines on Bloomberg alone that tell a um telling story:

Fed Revives Discussion of Inflation Target to Counter Risk of Price Slide

ECB Expanded Balance Sheet by 36 Percent Last Year to Revive Bank Lending

Apartment Rents Fall, Vacancies Rise to Four-Year High on U.S. Job Losses

Shopping Center Vacancies in U.S. Approach 10-Year High as Stores Fail

Procter & Gamble Fights to Refinance as U.S. Borrowings Reach $2 Trillion

U.S. Banks Will Need to Raise More Cash in 2009, Meredith Whitney Writes

I’ll leave it at that, but what I’m seeing is RECESSION coupled with the Fed trying to stave it off through any means necessary, which is now including outright purchases of securities on the open markets.  Again we have no savings and are either monetizing debt or borrowing it from somewhere.  To do this will be disastrous to the dollar and our reputation as a solid financial center of the world.  Sure there are plenty of other economies in dire situations, but in the end who will come out with the heads up high and who will come out still in the sand?

Withdrawal Symptoms

Posted on by
2

If my emotional barometer is any indication of where people’s minds are at the moment then I can only label it as coming down or recovering from a major hangover. It is the Sunday afternoon after a big night out sipping on your bloody mary to ease the pain.

We have been living on credit and tons of it.  At some point it becomes unsustainable and the house of cards tumbles down.  

Getting back to my analogy, think of drinking a ton of alcohol or coffee.  You keep wanting more and more when you finally get to a point where your body is completely dependent.  Any reduction in the drug will cause mild to severe withdrawal symptoms, any increase doesn’t do anything. 

This is what happens with credit expansion.  Too much and everyone goes on a spending spree with all the cheap money.  Take away the cheap money and people stop spending, jobs vanish, incomes decrease, and the previously incurred debt can’t be paid off.

So, instead of going through withdrawal you decide to take a lesser amount of the drug to make your hangover go away or slightly abate. However, you are still hungover. This pattern will continue until either you are completely free of the drug or your tolerance is now much lower enabling you to start increasing the amount as it now has a new profound effect as it did when you first started.  

It seems to me that we are in the post-crash hangover stage, but we aren’t completely free from the addiction.  We have taken a bit of the drug to ease the suffering.  The more of the drug we took the more likely we are to repeat the cycle.  We still need the drug to continue, otherwise we are going to feel like crap.  Hence, we still have a ways to go before we can recover.

If all goes as planned we will have a new President tomorrow and no longer will have to listen to the political banter at least for a while.  One piece of the uncertainty puzzle will be put into place, and we can focus on other issues.

In a NY Times article:

“We don’t know if it’s the end of the bear market yet, but it looks as though the bear has taken a nap,” said Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at Standard & Poor’s equity research. “So investors are thinking, let’s enjoy a bit of a relief, both from the market’s lows and from the endless pre-election rhetoric.”

Other factors seemed to be playing into the rally as well, including a continuing round of coordinated interest rate cuts worldwide, the ongoing thaw in the credit markets, and the increasing resiliency of the markets to the daily drumbeat of bad economic news. The extreme volatility of recent weeks has calmed in recent days, though trading volume remained light.

Yes, the bear is taking a nap, but we are still very hungover and have taken a bit of the drug to help relieve the pain.  People haven’t completely capitulated and given up on equities.  They are hesitant yes, but still hopeful that things will turn around.

There is a major bear lurking around the corner and it isn’t just in the US.  They are giving birth around the world and China is no exception.  In a Financial Times article:

Wen Jiabao, China’s prime minister, warned that high growth was needed to maintain social stability as fresh evidence emerged on Monday that China’s economy was slowing quickly.

…

“We must be crystal-clear that without a certain pace of economic growth, there will be difficulties with employment, fiscal revenues and social development . . . and factors damaging social stability will grow,” he wrote in the magazine, Seeking Truth.

So, while equity markets recover mildly on noticeably low volume, bears are growling from afar.  Manufacturing is way down, consumer’s aren’t spending, banks still are reluctant to loan, major exporters are slowing.  I’d call this a worldwide slowdown of massive proportion.  We still have credit cards right?

What lies ahead…?

Recession, higher interest rates, massive inflation, higher commodity prices, continued decrease in housing, rising unemployment, and eventual devaluation of the United States dollar.  When will all of these things play out?  

My crystal ball has a few cracks, but for inflation to take hold we have to complete the current phase of de-leveraging and disinflation (which is bringing down prices).  Once this phase is complete all the newly created money will directly cause inflated prices.

Banks are lending — NOT

Posted on by
Reply

The theory was beautiful (well in the abstract)…

Give troubled banks more credit and they will lend it out and the economy will stop its free-fall.  Now, that sounds like utopia to me.  Create credit and we will all be saved for unemployement, slowing production, decreased consumer spending, and rising interest rates.

HOLD ON… let’s put a toe back on the plane of reality…

Banks aren’t lending much more than before eventhough they are being handed gobs of cash.  Why wouldn’t banks lend out free money?

What if…

  1. there aren’t any borrowers worthy of getting loans? — Let’s say during a recession!  Oh right the economy slows WAY… DOWN.
  2. there are more troubled banks and unknowns on banks balance sheets.
  3. banks are holding the cash knowing full well that there is another storm on the horizon

I didn’t pull this out of thin air like the Fed does with money.  An article in the NY Times starts with

The banks aren’t lending. And despite what you have heard, they probably won’t start just yet.

Sorry Paulson your plan isn’t working.

“Our purpose is to increase confidence in our banks and increase the confidence of our banks, so that they will deploy, not hoard, their capital,” Mr. Paulson said in a statement Monday. “And we expect them to do so, as increased confidence will lead to increased lending. This increased lending will benefit the U.S. economy and the American people.

Of course, with a $250 billion injection into America’s biggest banks — not all of which were troubled — Mr. Paulson has a political sales job to do. And no requirements to lend were attached to the money. (Some banks may use the money to buy others.)

But Mr. Paulson is making a big assumption about confidence, because until the real economy recovers — which could take more than a year — lending to Main Street is unlikely to return rapidly to normal levels.

“It doesn’t matter how much Hank Paulson gives us,” said an influential senior official at a big bank that received money from the government, “no one is going to lend a nickel until the economy turns.” The official added: “Who are we going to lend money to?” before repeating an old saw about banking: “Only people who don’t need it.”

Again banks don’t want to lend into a very uncertain future.  They want confidence in the economy — there isn’t any and the opposite is occurring.  People are spending less as they become more concerned about the safety of their jobs.  Most Americans have no savings cushion to fall back on.

Roger Bootle and Jonathan Loynes of Capital Economics in London wrote a sobering note on Monday about the cash infusions into European banks that may apply here as well. “We expect rising loan defaults and further asset write-offs over the next couple of years to practically wipe out the governments’ capital injections, leaving banks back at square one,” they said. “Given that banks will need to increase their capital in order to expand their lending book, these measures on their own are unlikely to prevent bank lending from stagnating.”

Wait a minute… all that money being put into the system to restore confidence and spur lending may just vanish?  So at the end of the day more banks fail, the economy continues to contract, available credit continues to contract, unemployment rises, and interest rates eventually rise.  This isn’t what Paulson sold to us with his bailout plan.  Were we duped?

Nah, the individuals responsible for the government’s actions are always in need of votes and making a horrible situation look not so bad or at least feasible to fix.  At the end of the day our failed bailouts will have a disastrous effect.  The consequences are a HUGE debt burden, a larger interest payment on that debt, the world losing confidence in the value of the dollar, and a prolonged recession probably followed by major inflation.  I’ve been singing this song for a while and it will take time to play out, but as you can see this is a VERY rocky road.

Another bailout, more credit… when will we learn?

Posted on by
Reply

It seems that the tune to march to these days is credit o credit we need more credit.  Somehow somewhere we forgot quite quickly that credit got us into this mess.  If credit is expanding much faster than real economic growth the outcome will be instability in the economy.  That is like an individual taking on more debt while their income stays steady or worse is in decline.  At some point in the future the debt will become unmanageable.  Once debt is too great a burden that individual is going to have to either sell assets to pay off the debt, declare bankruptcy, increase their income, or default.  The one thing that makes the government lucky or so it seems is that they can increase “income” through inflating the money supply event hough it is really illusionary.  All they have done is take money from every taxpayer to service the ever growing debt burden.

I find it distressing that Bernake and Co. are talking about further fiscal stimulus to the tune of $150 billion dollars and Democrats want double that.  We are already over $1 trillion in debt for this year.  Where o where are we to find this money?  Perhaps a leprechaun will appear beneath the rainbow and we will be saved.  If the politicians and bureaucrats have their way this is exactly what will happen.  

American’s have no or very little savings to invest in capital goods.  We are laden in debt and attempting to service that debt.  If unemployment rises substantially then servicing that debt will become even more burdensome.  Another stimulus package will probably be used to payoff existing debt, which does nothing for stimulating growth.

So, what do we do…  Many have proposed various solutions.  

Why not reduce the size of the government for one. 
– Yes, people will lose their jobs.  However, with time they will find other jobs as that money can now be used for other things.

Reduce taxes, and the size of the tax code.
 —  Our tax code is way to complicated and confusing.  I would love to know the cumulative hours wasted on tax returns every year by companies and individuals.  Imagine if we had a flat tax of 10-15%…  get rid of tax incentives, credits, exemptions, etc…  Not everyone is going to be happy about it, but a reduction in the tax burden in actual numbers and time would enable people to use their money elsewhere and as they choose versus having someone decide for them where to best put it to use.   

Return our currency to one backed by a physical commodity — GOLD and SILVER
 — The government would hate this, but it would eliminate the major booms and busts and enable constant growth.  Money would again have a true value versus the value instilled by the gov’t.  Money’s value would be returned to the people and taken away from the money printers, and confiscators of our savings.

Bring our troops home
 — We don’t need to be the world’s police.  Occupying over 140 countries is absurd and very costly.  I agree that we need to have an army to defend the country, but it needs to be defensive and not offensive.  Our paws are in too many honey jars.  We are bound to piss off the bees, which we are continually doing and then blame them for getting upset at us.  Ironic don’t you think.

Remove all subsidies and tariffs
 — All they do is distort the market place and what people produce.  For example why do we have corn syrup in our soda, but in the rest of the world they use sugar?  Corn is highly subsidized, while sugar has many tariffs on it.  Corn Syrup is cheaper due to government policy.  Corn farmers love this, while it hurts all of us.  We pay for those subsidies, and also pay high sugar prices.

I’m going to leave it at that, but there are plenty more options.  People say that ignorance is bliss.  NO it isn’t bliss it is being LAZY.  Will you get out of a parking ticket or a speeding ticket if you claim ignorance?  Not unless you are really smooth with words.  

What happened to being responsible? If you take on too much debt then you have a problem.  American’s have a virus, and it is contagious.  We live beyond our means, and then when we get in trouble someone bails us out at the cost of everyone.  The one’s who really pay are the responsible ones who are living within their means.

Banks win with T.K.O!

Posted on by
Reply

If I had to place a bet on who would win… The major banks or the taxpayer… The BANKS win!!  Hooray the institution is saved!  Round after round of talks end in someone getting bailed out or should I say supported or prevented from failing so the whole economy doesn’t come tumbling down.  The markets seems to be happy with the results of the weekend’s coordinated world-wide effort to support the financial industry.  The Dow is presently up 585 points and we are green across the boards.  

However, treasuries are losing ground quickly and Jim Rogers is shorting them.  I took that position earlier, but was too early and also got out too early.  Live and learn right?  I plan to reestablish that plan shortly.  Additionally, I don’t see how this is the “bottom” of the current crisis.  At every point along this decline since last October every time there is intervention the market rallies and then continues in is downward trajectory.  

I’m not watching CNBC, but I imagine everyone is talking about how last week was bottom and we are off to the races.  For a bottom to be in place we needed much more despair and hatred towards the markets.  Regardless of the long-term outlook (just wait for earnings season to really kick in) there is no point swimming up a waterfall.  Therefore I closed out a large position of ultra short index ETFs.  My bias is still short, but I’m not going to be surprised if we see an intermediate rally followed by the final shit storm of destruction.  Remember the fundamentals haven’t changed, only the fact that the world’s leaders are trying to hold things together to avoid a complete collapse.  This weekend only restored confidence to get people lending to each other again, and to prevent runs on the banks.

And alas it’s my 30th Birthday!  What a month to have a birthday eh!  I couldn’t have asked for a more excited, and hairbrained ride…

The US Dollar gaining? What?

Posted on by
Reply

Hyperinflation, inflation, deflation, depression, recession, stagflation… well which is it? I have no clue, but there is a massive monetary inflation occurring, and a looming recession.  Hmmm so does this mean a inflationary depression?  Yikes.

Last week I took a break from overwhelming myself about the markets and the state of the economy. The timing wasn’t perfect, but I had personal reasons.

Before I start on the quest of exploring our present situation of the potententional…”ion”s I want to make sure we are on the same page. Therefore lets have a defining moment:

Money: Easily exchangeable, is relatively scarce, and is a store of value.

Inflation: An increase in the money supply
Deflation: A decrease in the money supply
Hyperinflation: A self-perpetuating unstoppable (more or less) state of inflation
Recession: A significant decline in business activity, mainly a contraction in the economy or slowing of growth
Depression: A long-term economic state characterized by unemployment and low prices and low levels of trade and investment
Stagflation: A period of time characterized by high inflation and recessionary conditions.

I’ve been looking at calls for the vaious scenarios and needed some clarification as to what happens in the various situations.  For the most part it seems obvious, but I’ve been struggling with the increase in the value of the United States dollar.  Our national debt is above 10 trillion and rising rapidly as the recent bailouts continue, and the most recent increase in military spending added another $612 billion that we have to pay for.

Why is the risk of deflation so frightening that the Fed, Treasury, governments, and foreign central banks will do anything to stave it off?  Deflation is like the grim reaper knocking on your door for a fiat currency.  A fiat currency survives on debt and inflation (credit expansion).  Too much inflation and it can become worthless, and negative inflation (deflation) and it gains value.  That sounds like a good thing but it isn’t.  As the currency gains in value debt becomes more expensive, and thus more difficult to pay off.  Imagine taking out a $100,000.00 loan with todays dollars and paying it off with dollars from 1930.  Good luck! During deflation prices also fall due to the decrease in the money supply and as there is no longer credit being handed out for people to use to consume and invest.  The whole system comes tumbling down and the reaper walks in the door to say hello!

When credit is created (a loan) that is an increase in the money supply, and when it is paid off that is a decrease in the money supply.  Say the loan is $100.00.  That is $100.00 of money put into existance with a very small percentage actually backing it.  Now I repay my $100.00 loan and that credit is erased and the money supply contracts.  This is the normal situation that occurs daily.  However, if people don’t want to lend or borrow then we have a problem.

No credit means no ability to borrow, which means no abilty to purchase goods and services.  Everything is based on debt today.  The change began in 1913 with the Fed, and the ultimate shift to fiat money was in 1972 during the Nixon presidency when we abandoned the gold standard and thus savers were punished from that day forward.

Okay this leads to me to the strengthening of the United States Dollar…  Why I ask is it getting stronger.  Many argue that it is because Europe is weakening, which may be part of the picture.  However, I read something that made a clear point that because European banks are required to hold dollars for various toxic debt they hold denominated in dollars they normally use the interbank markets based on the LIBOR rate.  However, that market is seized up and nobody wants to lend so they start using the EUR / USD credit swap market.  As they purchase dollars its value goes up.  Notice today that the Euro gained against the dollar when the Fed decided to start purchasing short-term commercial paper.  They are stepping in and becoming the new mainstay for that market: which one?  EVERY MARKET <Interesting…>

And tomorrow is a new day!

Potential outcomes at current juncture…

Posted on by
3

I’m attempting to grapple everything going on apart from my disgust… and come up with a couple scenarios. Any help will be appreciated.

Overall economic trend:

  • - Economy is sliding deeper into a recession
  • - Housing prices continue to fall
  • - The dollar’s short-term value is undecided, and long term looking weak
  • - Unemployment rising
  • - Prices falling
  • - Interest rates falling

Present Situation:

If a bailout is passed we might be able to presume that:

  • - The dollar will lose value potentially very much if large reserves are sold off
  • - Interest rates will have to rise as that is the only way foreigners will want to hold dollars
  • - Imports will become very expensive
  • - Prices will skyrocket
  • - Recession will deepen – Depression?
  • - Stock market will rally — for how long?

If the bailout isn’t passed:

  • - Dollar might stabilize a bit
  • - Uncertainty will continue
  • - Markets will gyrate while overall trending down
  • - Financial markets will tighten
  • - Stock markets will plummet

Finally: A potential indicator of a dollar collapse

If interest rates rise and the dollar falls people are selling off their dollars and treasuries, which means nothing but bad for the dollar.

—–
How am I doing so far?

Copperfield & Houdini for Presidency!

Posted on by
Reply

I’ve attended a few performances by David Copperfield and he has performed the unbelievable.  Before my very own eyes a group of thirty people vanished into thin air.  Where did they go?  I watched the unbelievable made real right in front of me.  How could this be an illusion created to fool me into belief?  I ask you… HOW?

David Copperfield and Harry Houdini would probably be a better pair to run the government at this point.  At least they would give us a good show.  The current officials in office make my gut wrench.  We have migrated from the land of the free to nationalization of private property in the name of free markets.  Whoa… okay let’s get something straight.  WE DO NOT HAVE FREE MARKETS… NOT EVEN CLOSE  

If we actually had a system that represented free markets the Federal Reserve (a PRIVATE bank made up of member banks that are also PRIVATE) would not exist, we would still be on the gold standard, and the government wouldn’t even consider a bailout of the taxpayer’s funding, and the United States Treasury would not be proposing this amazing relief package for those who are mainly responsible for getting us into this mess.  

So, I mentioned two masters of illusion… Why?  What is being pulled off at the moment is happening in front of our eyes and for some like me is atrocious.  However, for others they think it is essential to the integrity of financial markets, financial institutions, and YOUR house.  The entire bailout is being purported as a bailout for the helpless homeowner, the saver, the middle class.  

The problem is that nobody knows how much any of this debt is actually worth.  Say the government buys $700,000,000,000,000.00 worth of debt at $0.20 on the dollar, which is great discount.  If that debt is in reality worth less than that we have a problem.  When will these notes be paid back, and in what form are the notes?  

Chris Martenson managed to grab part of an article that later disappeared from Bloomberg that said:

“The Treasury’s thinking is to make it as big and wide as possible so they have the flexibility to act if need be,” said Shane Oliver, Sydney-based head of investment strategy at AMP Capital Investors, which manages about $108 billion. “There have been losses on a whole range of U.S. debts and as the economy deteriorates in response to the housing slump those losses could escalate.” 

Treasury officials now propose buying what they term troubled assets, without specifying the type, according to a document obtained by Bloomberg News and confirmed by a congressional aide.

This effectively means any type of debt.  Let’s take a moment to see what forms of debt exist:

  • Credit Card DEBT
  • Mortgage DEBT
  • Automobile DEBT
  • Bond DEBT

………. and the list goes on ………….

So, we have the United States government wanting to take on all this debt in the name of saving the financial markets.  Let’s just take the debt from the banks to clear up their balance sheets so they don’t have to write it off, which would cause them to have to increase their reserves because their assets are now below the minimum.  We could lower that further, but it has already been lowered to 3% of total assets.  That means they most likely loaned out the other 97%.  

As the Fed creates money our dollar is worth less and less.  Where is the Federal Government going to come up with $700 Billion dollars?  They will create it from nothing, which the Federal Reserve is great at doing.  Inflation will not solve the problem, only exacerbate it.  Newt Gingrich opposes it, and admits that if he is wrong in not supporting it that it is the lesser of two evils.  

If this bill passes please say goodbye to the dollar as we know it.  Foreigners might finally reach the breaking point to where they are afraid to purchase dollars and realize that buying them to keep their currency less expensive is futile.

Stocks for the LONG LONG LONG term

Posted on by
Reply

“The best therapeutic move for long-term investors is to turn off your TV so as not to get caught up in all of the sensational headlines. The stock market has been and will continue to be the best source for wealth creation over the long-term.”

–Patrick J O’Hare, Briefing.com

I love hearing that the stock market for the long term is the way to make money. Close your eyes and prey. Whoa… Did you close your eyes and watch the money flow into your pockets when you labored every day for what you have invested?

What happens if you are in individual stocks and some of them go bankrupt? The indices adjust and find another company to take the failed ones place. Yes, the market has gone up in the long term, but what if you invested at one of the tops before the crash and had to wait 16 years to get your money back? I don’t know about you but I’d rather sit on the sidelines and wait it out. There are ways to see the hurricane of in the distance, but if you are unwilling or unable it will hit you.

When Columbus was making landfall the natives didn’t see his ships because they weren’t part of their reality. If we can’t adjust our thoughts to accept something new or different then how are we going to prepare for a possible change of future direction?

Read the following article… There is a grim reality facing us all. Investment banks have used up their ability to lend to businesses. Considering that the growth of our economy depends on the ability of credit we are facing a MAJOR did I say MAJOR issue in front of us.

Money Central Article

I’m also hearing local news radio having discussions about what to do with your money to keep it safe. Last night I heard someone saying that this is the time to start thinking about buying. Sure there is the old adage that when there is blood in the streets buy. When if the blood is only at a trickle when it will be a river?