Tag Archives: GDP

Congressional Budget Outlook :: CBO

Posted on by
Reply

Hold your hats folks as here are some of the forecasts for 2009 (link):

  • GDP falling by 2.2%
  • Slow recovery in 2010
  • > 9% unemployment by 2010
  • Decline in inflation (hmmmm… if monetary policy says anything this will reverse or at least eventually destroy the dollar)
  • Continued decline in housing prices
  • Decline in real consumption of more than 1%
  • Indeterminate on the financial system

And the best of all

$1.2 trillion dollar budget deficit for 2009*

*That doesn’t include the proposed stimulus package
*That amounts to 8.3% of GDP

So, we have an economy in decline, and digging a deeper and deeper hole to climb out of.  What I really want to know is how are we going to pay for 1) a 1.2T dollar deficit, and 2) a large fiscal stimulus package of a indeterminate size.

Let’s see our foreign friends have been purchasing our debt, which enabled us to essentially live off of their productive labor.  China for example is seeing a marjor reduction in exports, its economy is contracting, and eventually it is going to have to decide if it is worth supporting the American lifestyle at their own expense.  Presently, everyone is so intertwined I think there is a fear that if one jumps the house of cards falls down and we all lose.  However, is it possible for say China to pull out of the house of cards with minimal damage?  Is there a way they can reduce their exposure to US debt, and not have their savings collapse?  This is something I’d really like to know.

Seems to me that if they slowly shift some of their dollar reserves into commodities and other currencies SLOWLY, especially when there is increased demand they will be able to lessen their exposure.  The US import market is tanking, and has been tanking.  With unemployment increasing Bloomberg people are going to have a smaller income and will be forces to save thus hurting exporting countries.  This isn’t a US phenomena alone as Europe and frankly the rest of the world is contracting simultaneously, while being fed a mouthful of credit from central banks to re-inflate the bubble.  Last I checked it is very difficult to inflate a popped bubble.

Let’s take the latest number from Taiwan Bloomberg.  Their exports dropped by a record 41.9%.  We all know that Taiwan exports electronics, which have been a major boon ever since the technological revolution, which also saw a major hiccuup in 2000-2003.  So, this is confirmation of a major exporting taking a major hit.  There will be ramifications for the Taiwanese economy.

I can’t imagine that after the dust settles the world’s economies will look the same.  The sea of money will shift to where is sees the most opportunity and in its movement will tear apart the economies of many.

Here are a few more headlines on Bloomberg alone that tell a um telling story:

Fed Revives Discussion of Inflation Target to Counter Risk of Price Slide

ECB Expanded Balance Sheet by 36 Percent Last Year to Revive Bank Lending

Apartment Rents Fall, Vacancies Rise to Four-Year High on U.S. Job Losses

Shopping Center Vacancies in U.S. Approach 10-Year High as Stores Fail

Procter & Gamble Fights to Refinance as U.S. Borrowings Reach $2 Trillion

U.S. Banks Will Need to Raise More Cash in 2009, Meredith Whitney Writes

I’ll leave it at that, but what I’m seeing is RECESSION coupled with the Fed trying to stave it off through any means necessary, which is now including outright purchases of securities on the open markets.  Again we have no savings and are either monetizing debt or borrowing it from somewhere.  To do this will be disastrous to the dollar and our reputation as a solid financial center of the world.  Sure there are plenty of other economies in dire situations, but in the end who will come out with the heads up high and who will come out still in the sand?

From turmoil to manipulation to control

Posted on by
Reply

TURMOIL, FEAR, CRISIS, PANIC, COLLAPSE, SAVING THE ECONOMY, BAILOUT, CONTROL… Notice the progression from left to right.  A few bumps in the road lead to an eventual bailout with control obtained due to matters rushed in a state of panic.  Do people act rationally when they are paniced?  NO  Generally, they look for a solution.  Someone to come along and say “follow me”  I know the way!  This is exactly what is happening with the proposed bailout plan that is thankfully hitting a few speed bumps.  However, Bernake, Paulson, and the Bush administration want to see it passed immediately.

Bloomberg article:    (Emphasis in bold mine)

“I believe if the credit markets are not functioning, that jobs will be lost, the unemployment rate will rise, more houses will be foreclosed upon, GDP will contract, that the economy will just not be able to recover,” Bernanke told the Senate Banking Committee today. “My interest is solely for the strength and recovery of the U.S. economy.”

Lawmakers have balked at rubber-stamping the Treasury plan to remove illiquid assets from the banking system, with Democrats demanding it support homeowners and limit executive pay, and Republicans resisting the plan’s reach and size.

Bernanke, putting aside his prepared remarks released earlier today, said the Treasury should buy illiquid assets at “hold-to-maturity” values rather than at discounted “fire- sale” prices. The suspension of “mark-to-market” accounting for assets, a change backed by “many banks,” would instead hurt investor confidence.

Let’s get this straight… Markets in turmoil, unknown amount of worthless assets, the banks don’t want to write them off because it will show up on their books, they will need more cash on hand once the bad debt is written off, which they don’t have, Bernake and Paulson want to push this though ASAP, Bernake and Paulson want to pay the HTM (Held to Maturity cost), and not a discounted price.  That is essentially paying for a salvaged car at the price it cost when new and in the showroom.  THIS IS NOT GOOD

HTM securities are those the investor intends to hold to maturity and is able to hold to maturity. Designation of a security as HTM allows the investor to report the security value at historical cost plus accretion or minus amortization. Unrealized gains or losses are not shown on the balance sheet, reflected in reported income, or reflected in reported net worth. 

What I want to know is what we aren’t seeing.  We have a bill trying to be pushed though Congress at a very rapid pace.  Lawmakers are being asked to assume at a minimum $700 billion worth of debt obligations that nobody knows the value of.  No bank in the world or private institution would consider doing such a thing.  However, the rules change when you say that it is in the taxpayer’s best interest in “saving” the economy, but behind the taxpayer’s back you are reaching into their pocket and pulling out hard earned cash.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac… A governmental department

Posted on by
Reply

I was originally going to write a post about how we always hear about the “New World Economy” prior to any boom / bust period.  This time I think the rules have finally changed as the United States is losing if it hasn’t already lost its status as the number one superpower, we are now the largest debtor in the world, and continuing to bail out thee who fails.  

Whether or not this time is different and we will recover is debatable.  What concerns me is the continuation of the Feds backing up private industry.  Had the United States government let Fannie and Freddie fail what would have happened?  Well, the stock market would have surely taken a tank, interest rates would have gone up versus dropping about .5%, and the dollar would have probably fallen dramatically.  

So what do we get?  – The Dow rises 290.04 points or 2.58%, the NASDAQ rises 13.88 or 0.62% and the S&P rises 25.48 to 2.05%.  Wait a minute here… The taxpayers meaning you and I get to foot the bill for this.  At a minimum the treasury is ready to pump in $100 billion into each company… oh wait are they really companies or departments of the government.  I guess that is up for the next presidency to decide.  Nothing like passing along the responsibility of the crisis.  

So, I present a question about all of this.  This being the cancer’s on the balance sheets of financial companies, a negative GDP that is still positive according to the gov’t, a extremely high CPI, and declining production and consumption.  

– Is it possible that we are going to see extreme volatility in the markets until the elections?  Probable, but as we have seen with every governmental intervention since 2007 there is a quick boom, and then continuation of the contraction.  Contraction meaning declining stock market prices.  The USG lagged in making a decion on the Fannie and Freddie debacle due to the upcoming election.  The longer they take the closer the election takes place.  Due to the recency effect people recall things closer to the present then the past.  Let’s just say that the economy looks somewhat okay going into the election.  What are the odds that McCain will have a better chance of winning over Obama?  Considering the past two elections…

I didn’t mean for this to go into a conspiracy theory or that I believe there is manipulation in the markets, but nothing seems to make sense at the moment.  What does make sense is that my dollar is losing its purchasing power, my condo is declining in value, prices are rising, and the US is bankrupt.  Oh but wait we can continue to print dollars like in the Posted in Debt, Economy, Federal Reserve, Finance, Investing, News, United States Dollar | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a reply

GDP growth 3.3% annually? Up from 1.9%? Right…

Posted on by
1

GDP cries foul!

When the numbers emerged today I was shocked. After my initial amazement sunk in I started to wonder what was “really” going on here…

My eighth grade science teacher (yes 8th grade was a long time ago) managed to prove through statistics that I and everyone else in the class didn’t exist. Fishy indeed! If I didn’t exist according to statistics, but was still sitting in the classroom with the other student and the teacher himself then one of two things were completely incorrect. One might have been an illusion (think The Matrix)… Well, we know it was the stats because I’m sitting at my computer writing this entry.

So, if we can prove something doesn’t exist through statistics, which are really just a mathematical representation of data, can we manipulate our results through statistics?

I highly doubt that the GDP is actually positive. Take a look at shadowstats.com, which undoes as much of the governmental massaging of the numbers as possible. At the moment we are actually at about a 9% annualized rate of inflation, and GDP is negative. Wait, GDP was just shown to be 3.3% annualized… again what does this all mean?

What recession?

We aren’t in a recession or at least that is the official figure. Of course we aren’t because to be in a recession requires two consecutive quarters of negative growth. Remember: We are in an election year! Interestingly according to shadowstats.com, we have had a negative GD since 2004.

I’m just skimming the surface and attempting to draw to your attention that what you see isn’t necessarily what you get. We are in a recession, and have been in a recession for quite some time now. However, the government wants us to believe that everything is okay, and that the economy will recover. My fear is that all this manipulation will lead to an even larger bust.

Look around you… are you seeing more for-sale signs of homes, more for-lease signs around town, people shopping less, more concerned about their jobs, etc…? These are not signs of economic growth, but fear.

So what?

Let’s make a prediction as these are always fun. If I’m right I get to stroke my ego a bit, and if I’m wrong… well I’m wrong.

The manipulation will continue as long as possible, but the market will prevail. Once it realizes the degree of major contraction in growth and productivity people’s sentiment will further shift as it is starting to now. Spending will dry up, credit won’t be lent, defaults will further, housing will keep falling, the US stock markets will free-fall, the dollar will resume its decline, and gold, silver, and commodities will eventually resume their bull market. Wow that is a mouthful. Might I be wrong…? Of course! If I could predict the future I would own an island and call it Gauntlett.

The election…

I’m going to go as far as to say that our markets are severely manipulated NOT by speculators, but by various government officials and policy. Going into the election with a perceived strong economy will give the incumbent’s party an edge that just might help them stay in office. We will know in November. After November the Fed won’t need to have such a loose monetary policy and might start to think about inflation and raise interest rates if the market doesn’t demand it sooner due to the risk of inflation to your savings and purchasing power. (Note: I didn’t say higher prices because what is really happening is your dollars are becoming worth less as more are put into circulation by the Fed.)