Tag Archives: interest

Socialized Heathcare… Do we want this?

Posted on by
Reply

First Step: Watch this video on Canadian Healthcare

Did you watch the video?  I would embed it so you can watch it here, but it seems that due to technological limitations (or decisions) that isn’t going to happen.  And no I’ve decided against figuring out how to circumvent such actions.  So, click the link already.  It is only 20 minutes out of your life to watch a humorous yet somewhat painful video on the realization of socialized health care.  Don’t believe me then click the link.

Obama Plan: How do we pay for it?

You may be wondering what my take on the Obama plan is.  Well, firstly I want to know how we are going to pay for it.  Really, Social Security is going in the red, and so is Medicare.  Last I check in the red means that it isn’t profitable, and also means that there is no money to fund it.  Tax reciepts are down significantly, not to mention State Tax receipts.

So, the “income” that the Federal Governement receives is down.  Remember that the government doesn’t actually make or produce anything and is soley funded by us the taxpayer.  So, to pay for this we are going to go further in the red.  We already have a trillion plus deficit for 2009, which means borrowing or printing substantial sums of money.

While Univeral Health Care sounds wonderful, but again to pay for it we have to get the money from somewhere.  That somewhere is from the “rich”.  Maybe you feel entitled to health care, maybe not.  Essentially what is going to happen is that money will be siphoned from those with high incomes to subsidize the plans.  This is a blatant transfer of wealth, which is what the government does.

At what point do high income earners decide that enough is enough and decide to earn less?  If I were taxed at say 60%, which means I get to keep 40% of my income my incentive to earn more declines.

Rationing: Supply and Demand

Here is where socialized health care gets interesting.  Let’s say there is $100 billion dollars allocated to public health care per year.  For the moment don’t worry about the exact sums of money as this is an example.

With that $100b services can be provided up to that point.  Once that point is reached or even if we start to near that point where if anything else is spent then the program is in the red.  How might the administrators prevent that from happening?

1) You have to wait in line for your turn… these lines could get really long

2) Deny you service… bummer looks like you don’t get that MRI

3) Rationing, where there is a limited number of services available

So, in a perfect world we would all be healthy, and have 100% health care.  As much as I’d like that to be a reality we have to be realistic.  The only thing we get for free is the air we breath.  Anything else requires work, which then can be exchanged for a good or service.  I’m not saying our present system is perfect, by no means, but I don’t think this is the way.

A bond bubble… Really?

Posted on by
Reply

Bonds, bonds, bonds…  United States Government bonds ARE the safest investment in the world besides cash.  Right?  They are aren’t they?  I mean they are backed by the taxing power of the United States Government so they have to be.  Well, sure you will get your money back at a measly 2.x% these days.  Isn’t that below the rate of inflation you ask…  why yes it is.  T-bills are paying tenths of a percentage so you choose.  Besides stocks and commodites have cost many a small fortune so investing in bonds is a wise decision.  Right?

There is much talk about a bond bubble, and I’ve been watching bond prices and their rates take off recently and also have a nice correction.   Generally I watch $TNX, which is the 10-year government bond yield.  Remember bond yields move inversley to their prices.  So, if yields go down then prices go up and vice versa.

So, we have seen equity and commodity prices collapse, housing prices, and while that was occuring treasury bond prices have taken off.  This MUST be a bubble right?  Perhaps, but you have to take into account who buys and sells bonds.  We have the individual investor, which makes up a small group.  The major purchasers of bonds are large institutions and governments.  For institutions let’s look at the money market industry.  They must hold a number of bonds based on their funds requirements.  For governments they buy and sell bonds all the time.  They sell them to raise money and other governments or institutions buy them for a “safe” return.

As a last resort the Federal Reserve will purchase bonds directly, thus monetizing debt (PRINTING MONEY), thus keeping bond prices high and yields low. Therefore bonds aren’t really controlled by investors as we like to think, but much larger fish in the sea.

So, what might we see when the world loses faith in the bond markets?  Auctions will be devoid of foreign buyers signaling that foreign demand has dried up.  This will spark the necesitated increase in interst rate as an incentive for others to borrow.  Simultaneously we might see a flee from bonds as investors are concerned about their future safety.

If you look at the news you will see exports are way down from exporting countries, which means that importing coutries aren’t importing anywhere near previous levels.  Welcome to a major recession, yes there are grumblings of this being a depresssion.  I supose it depends on your viewpoint.  Now what happens when these net exporting countries decide to stop buying our debt because they have their own problems at home and have to use their saving?  They will no longer be purchasing our debt, which will make it more and more difficult for the USA to spend, and service existing debt.  Being that most of our debt is short term as the interest rate rises so do the debt servicing costs.  As these costs rise, tax income decreases then we are stuck with either printing more money (the short and easy “solution”), we cut back on gov’t services, or a combination of both.

Watch out for rising interest rates and a falling dollar.  So far we have neither, but once we do this will signal a shift from the US Dollar as secure to the US dollar as a high risk.  Expect other currencies in better situtations than us to see their currencies gain value, while the major winners will be commodities and gold.

Withdrawal Symptoms

Posted on by
2

If my emotional barometer is any indication of where people’s minds are at the moment then I can only label it as coming down or recovering from a major hangover. It is the Sunday afternoon after a big night out sipping on your bloody mary to ease the pain.

We have been living on credit and tons of it.  At some point it becomes unsustainable and the house of cards tumbles down.  

Getting back to my analogy, think of drinking a ton of alcohol or coffee.  You keep wanting more and more when you finally get to a point where your body is completely dependent.  Any reduction in the drug will cause mild to severe withdrawal symptoms, any increase doesn’t do anything. 

This is what happens with credit expansion.  Too much and everyone goes on a spending spree with all the cheap money.  Take away the cheap money and people stop spending, jobs vanish, incomes decrease, and the previously incurred debt can’t be paid off.

So, instead of going through withdrawal you decide to take a lesser amount of the drug to make your hangover go away or slightly abate. However, you are still hungover. This pattern will continue until either you are completely free of the drug or your tolerance is now much lower enabling you to start increasing the amount as it now has a new profound effect as it did when you first started.  

It seems to me that we are in the post-crash hangover stage, but we aren’t completely free from the addiction.  We have taken a bit of the drug to ease the suffering.  The more of the drug we took the more likely we are to repeat the cycle.  We still need the drug to continue, otherwise we are going to feel like crap.  Hence, we still have a ways to go before we can recover.

If all goes as planned we will have a new President tomorrow and no longer will have to listen to the political banter at least for a while.  One piece of the uncertainty puzzle will be put into place, and we can focus on other issues.

In a NY Times article:

“We don’t know if it’s the end of the bear market yet, but it looks as though the bear has taken a nap,” said Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at Standard & Poor’s equity research. “So investors are thinking, let’s enjoy a bit of a relief, both from the market’s lows and from the endless pre-election rhetoric.”

Other factors seemed to be playing into the rally as well, including a continuing round of coordinated interest rate cuts worldwide, the ongoing thaw in the credit markets, and the increasing resiliency of the markets to the daily drumbeat of bad economic news. The extreme volatility of recent weeks has calmed in recent days, though trading volume remained light.

Yes, the bear is taking a nap, but we are still very hungover and have taken a bit of the drug to help relieve the pain.  People haven’t completely capitulated and given up on equities.  They are hesitant yes, but still hopeful that things will turn around.

There is a major bear lurking around the corner and it isn’t just in the US.  They are giving birth around the world and China is no exception.  In a Financial Times article:

Wen Jiabao, China’s prime minister, warned that high growth was needed to maintain social stability as fresh evidence emerged on Monday that China’s economy was slowing quickly.

…

“We must be crystal-clear that without a certain pace of economic growth, there will be difficulties with employment, fiscal revenues and social development . . . and factors damaging social stability will grow,” he wrote in the magazine, Seeking Truth.

So, while equity markets recover mildly on noticeably low volume, bears are growling from afar.  Manufacturing is way down, consumer’s aren’t spending, banks still are reluctant to loan, major exporters are slowing.  I’d call this a worldwide slowdown of massive proportion.  We still have credit cards right?

What lies ahead…?

Recession, higher interest rates, massive inflation, higher commodity prices, continued decrease in housing, rising unemployment, and eventual devaluation of the United States dollar.  When will all of these things play out?  

My crystal ball has a few cracks, but for inflation to take hold we have to complete the current phase of de-leveraging and disinflation (which is bringing down prices).  Once this phase is complete all the newly created money will directly cause inflated prices.

Similarities to 1929

Posted on by
Reply

This is a very pertinant watch if you are interested in the similarities of today to the 1929 crash. I keep looking at the charts and percentage changes from prior to 1929 till today. So, far we have almost retraced on the Dow 100% since the October 2002 low. If we cross that level of support I’m concerned that we won’t see another bottom until we hit about 1000 or 500 on the Dow.

Since about 1982 the Dow has taken off with only three decent corrections in 1987, 2002, and the one playing out today. I realize that we have to look at the Dow adjusted for inflation as that is implicit in the numbers, but all I’m trying to get across is that the bottom might be farther away than any of us can imagine.

Anyways, enough for now… Watch the video if you haven’t already.

Banks are lending — NOT

Posted on by
Reply

The theory was beautiful (well in the abstract)…

Give troubled banks more credit and they will lend it out and the economy will stop its free-fall.  Now, that sounds like utopia to me.  Create credit and we will all be saved for unemployement, slowing production, decreased consumer spending, and rising interest rates.

HOLD ON… let’s put a toe back on the plane of reality…

Banks aren’t lending much more than before eventhough they are being handed gobs of cash.  Why wouldn’t banks lend out free money?

What if…

  1. there aren’t any borrowers worthy of getting loans? — Let’s say during a recession!  Oh right the economy slows WAY… DOWN.
  2. there are more troubled banks and unknowns on banks balance sheets.
  3. banks are holding the cash knowing full well that there is another storm on the horizon

I didn’t pull this out of thin air like the Fed does with money.  An article in the NY Times starts with

The banks aren’t lending. And despite what you have heard, they probably won’t start just yet.

Sorry Paulson your plan isn’t working.

“Our purpose is to increase confidence in our banks and increase the confidence of our banks, so that they will deploy, not hoard, their capital,” Mr. Paulson said in a statement Monday. “And we expect them to do so, as increased confidence will lead to increased lending. This increased lending will benefit the U.S. economy and the American people.

Of course, with a $250 billion injection into America’s biggest banks — not all of which were troubled — Mr. Paulson has a political sales job to do. And no requirements to lend were attached to the money. (Some banks may use the money to buy others.)

But Mr. Paulson is making a big assumption about confidence, because until the real economy recovers — which could take more than a year — lending to Main Street is unlikely to return rapidly to normal levels.

“It doesn’t matter how much Hank Paulson gives us,” said an influential senior official at a big bank that received money from the government, “no one is going to lend a nickel until the economy turns.” The official added: “Who are we going to lend money to?” before repeating an old saw about banking: “Only people who don’t need it.”

Again banks don’t want to lend into a very uncertain future.  They want confidence in the economy — there isn’t any and the opposite is occurring.  People are spending less as they become more concerned about the safety of their jobs.  Most Americans have no savings cushion to fall back on.

Roger Bootle and Jonathan Loynes of Capital Economics in London wrote a sobering note on Monday about the cash infusions into European banks that may apply here as well. “We expect rising loan defaults and further asset write-offs over the next couple of years to practically wipe out the governments’ capital injections, leaving banks back at square one,” they said. “Given that banks will need to increase their capital in order to expand their lending book, these measures on their own are unlikely to prevent bank lending from stagnating.”

Wait a minute… all that money being put into the system to restore confidence and spur lending may just vanish?  So at the end of the day more banks fail, the economy continues to contract, available credit continues to contract, unemployment rises, and interest rates eventually rise.  This isn’t what Paulson sold to us with his bailout plan.  Were we duped?

Nah, the individuals responsible for the government’s actions are always in need of votes and making a horrible situation look not so bad or at least feasible to fix.  At the end of the day our failed bailouts will have a disastrous effect.  The consequences are a HUGE debt burden, a larger interest payment on that debt, the world losing confidence in the value of the dollar, and a prolonged recession probably followed by major inflation.  I’ve been singing this song for a while and it will take time to play out, but as you can see this is a VERY rocky road.

Bernake admits financials out of control…

Posted on by
4

In an article from the Chicago Tribune

“We have lost control,” said Hale, quoting Bernanke. “We cannot stabilize the dollar. We cannot control commodity prices.”

Hale is an economist who had a private meeting with Ben Bernanke several months ago. Now, we are finally feeling the full effect of the loss of control.

I really hope that many of you have hedged your portfolios already or gotten out of the markets. The dollar is next unless perhaps interest rates are raised as an emergency measure to prevent the fallout. Expect housing prices to continue their descent as liquidity evaporates.

The banking system is insolvent.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac… A governmental department

Posted on by
Reply

I was originally going to write a post about how we always hear about the “New World Economy” prior to any boom / bust period.  This time I think the rules have finally changed as the United States is losing if it hasn’t already lost its status as the number one superpower, we are now the largest debtor in the world, and continuing to bail out thee who fails.  

Whether or not this time is different and we will recover is debatable.  What concerns me is the continuation of the Feds backing up private industry.  Had the United States government let Fannie and Freddie fail what would have happened?  Well, the stock market would have surely taken a tank, interest rates would have gone up versus dropping about .5%, and the dollar would have probably fallen dramatically.  

So what do we get?  – The Dow rises 290.04 points or 2.58%, the NASDAQ rises 13.88 or 0.62% and the S&P rises 25.48 to 2.05%.  Wait a minute here… The taxpayers meaning you and I get to foot the bill for this.  At a minimum the treasury is ready to pump in $100 billion into each company… oh wait are they really companies or departments of the government.  I guess that is up for the next presidency to decide.  Nothing like passing along the responsibility of the crisis.  

So, I present a question about all of this.  This being the cancer’s on the balance sheets of financial companies, a negative GDP that is still positive according to the gov’t, a extremely high CPI, and declining production and consumption.  

– Is it possible that we are going to see extreme volatility in the markets until the elections?  Probable, but as we have seen with every governmental intervention since 2007 there is a quick boom, and then continuation of the contraction.  Contraction meaning declining stock market prices.  The USG lagged in making a decion on the Fannie and Freddie debacle due to the upcoming election.  The longer they take the closer the election takes place.  Due to the recency effect people recall things closer to the present then the past.  Let’s just say that the economy looks somewhat okay going into the election.  What are the odds that McCain will have a better chance of winning over Obama?  Considering the past two elections…

I didn’t mean for this to go into a conspiracy theory or that I believe there is manipulation in the markets, but nothing seems to make sense at the moment.  What does make sense is that my dollar is losing its purchasing power, my condo is declining in value, prices are rising, and the US is bankrupt.  Oh but wait we can continue to print dollars like in the Posted in Debt, Economy, Federal Reserve, Finance, Investing, News, United States Dollar | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a reply