Auto Industry Bailout!

While we all have our eyes on Bernake, Paulson, Bush and $700,000,000,000,000.00 what is another $25,000,000,000,000.00 for some automakers. There were signs of distress and as the Financial Times reports (article) they have been lobbying Washington for sometime for a “loan”.

The continuing resolution provides funding for $7.5bn, which is the estimated subsidy on the loans – in other words, the cost to the government of providing them at well below market rates.

Well it is a loan after all so we are only giving them $7.5bn instead of $25bn because they have to pay it back.  Where I ask did we get in the business of bailing out private industry? No it isn’t anything new unfortunately. 

Most American cars are crap.  They are ugly, fall apart, and aren’t worth the steel they sit on.  Would I choose to spend my tax dollars on helping out a flailing industry?  If the auto industry didn’t foresee higher gas prices, and thus a slowing of SUV sales well then they deserve to go out of business.

I’m leaving out the part about the autoworker.  This isn’t about Ford or GM it is about the laborer who would lose their job.  I think I’m going to have to do an article about Econ 101, but from and Austrian and NOT Keynesian perspective.  All we are doing by subsidizing and bailing out all these corporations is encouraging mediocracy and unnecessary risk taking.  

If I started an auto company and nobody liked my cars then I go out of business, my employees find other jobs, and life moves on.  Instead we take taxpayer dollars that we have no choice in providing to the government and prop up failing industry.  It is an easy sell because as Shelly Lonbard, and analyst at Gimme Credit, a corporate bond research company, told clients this week that

“blue collar workers are more sympathetic victims than ‘rich’ investment bankers. So it’s easier to defend loans designed to save close to 100,000 jobs in the shrinking US manufacturing industry.”

Question: Why is the US auto industry shrinking?  

Answer: Labor unions, pension benefits, poor products, and government subsidies.  Please add to this list in the comments as it isn’t all inclusive.  

Who is next?  Biotech, Johnson and Johnson, Microsoft, Amazon, Etrade… let’s just sprinkle some money to anyone who lobbies enough.  I’m sick.

Stocks for the LONG LONG LONG term

“The best therapeutic move for long-term investors is to turn off your TV so as not to get caught up in all of the sensational headlines. The stock market has been and will continue to be the best source for wealth creation over the long-term.”

–Patrick J O’Hare, Briefing.com

I love hearing that the stock market for the long term is the way to make money. Close your eyes and prey. Whoa… Did you close your eyes and watch the money flow into your pockets when you labored every day for what you have invested?

What happens if you are in individual stocks and some of them go bankrupt? The indices adjust and find another company to take the failed ones place. Yes, the market has gone up in the long term, but what if you invested at one of the tops before the crash and had to wait 16 years to get your money back? I don’t know about you but I’d rather sit on the sidelines and wait it out. There are ways to see the hurricane of in the distance, but if you are unwilling or unable it will hit you.

When Columbus was making landfall the natives didn’t see his ships because they weren’t part of their reality. If we can’t adjust our thoughts to accept something new or different then how are we going to prepare for a possible change of future direction?

Read the following article… There is a grim reality facing us all. Investment banks have used up their ability to lend to businesses. Considering that the growth of our economy depends on the ability of credit we are facing a MAJOR did I say MAJOR issue in front of us.

Money Central Article

I’m also hearing local news radio having discussions about what to do with your money to keep it safe. Last night I heard someone saying that this is the time to start thinking about buying. Sure there is the old adage that when there is blood in the streets buy. When if the blood is only at a trickle when it will be a river?