Tag Archives: Politics

Withdrawal Symptoms

Posted on by
2

If my emotional barometer is any indication of where people’s minds are at the moment then I can only label it as coming down or recovering from a major hangover. It is the Sunday afternoon after a big night out sipping on your bloody mary to ease the pain.

We have been living on credit and tons of it.  At some point it becomes unsustainable and the house of cards tumbles down.  

Getting back to my analogy, think of drinking a ton of alcohol or coffee.  You keep wanting more and more when you finally get to a point where your body is completely dependent.  Any reduction in the drug will cause mild to severe withdrawal symptoms, any increase doesn’t do anything. 

This is what happens with credit expansion.  Too much and everyone goes on a spending spree with all the cheap money.  Take away the cheap money and people stop spending, jobs vanish, incomes decrease, and the previously incurred debt can’t be paid off.

So, instead of going through withdrawal you decide to take a lesser amount of the drug to make your hangover go away or slightly abate. However, you are still hungover. This pattern will continue until either you are completely free of the drug or your tolerance is now much lower enabling you to start increasing the amount as it now has a new profound effect as it did when you first started.  

It seems to me that we are in the post-crash hangover stage, but we aren’t completely free from the addiction.  We have taken a bit of the drug to ease the suffering.  The more of the drug we took the more likely we are to repeat the cycle.  We still need the drug to continue, otherwise we are going to feel like crap.  Hence, we still have a ways to go before we can recover.

If all goes as planned we will have a new President tomorrow and no longer will have to listen to the political banter at least for a while.  One piece of the uncertainty puzzle will be put into place, and we can focus on other issues.

In a NY Times article:

“We don’t know if it’s the end of the bear market yet, but it looks as though the bear has taken a nap,” said Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at Standard & Poor’s equity research. “So investors are thinking, let’s enjoy a bit of a relief, both from the market’s lows and from the endless pre-election rhetoric.”

Other factors seemed to be playing into the rally as well, including a continuing round of coordinated interest rate cuts worldwide, the ongoing thaw in the credit markets, and the increasing resiliency of the markets to the daily drumbeat of bad economic news. The extreme volatility of recent weeks has calmed in recent days, though trading volume remained light.

Yes, the bear is taking a nap, but we are still very hungover and have taken a bit of the drug to help relieve the pain.  People haven’t completely capitulated and given up on equities.  They are hesitant yes, but still hopeful that things will turn around.

There is a major bear lurking around the corner and it isn’t just in the US.  They are giving birth around the world and China is no exception.  In a Financial Times article:

Wen Jiabao, China’s prime minister, warned that high growth was needed to maintain social stability as fresh evidence emerged on Monday that China’s economy was slowing quickly.

…

“We must be crystal-clear that without a certain pace of economic growth, there will be difficulties with employment, fiscal revenues and social development . . . and factors damaging social stability will grow,” he wrote in the magazine, Seeking Truth.

So, while equity markets recover mildly on noticeably low volume, bears are growling from afar.  Manufacturing is way down, consumer’s aren’t spending, banks still are reluctant to loan, major exporters are slowing.  I’d call this a worldwide slowdown of massive proportion.  We still have credit cards right?

What lies ahead…?

Recession, higher interest rates, massive inflation, higher commodity prices, continued decrease in housing, rising unemployment, and eventual devaluation of the United States dollar.  When will all of these things play out?  

My crystal ball has a few cracks, but for inflation to take hold we have to complete the current phase of de-leveraging and disinflation (which is bringing down prices).  Once this phase is complete all the newly created money will directly cause inflated prices.

Banks are lending — NOT

Posted on by
Reply

The theory was beautiful (well in the abstract)…

Give troubled banks more credit and they will lend it out and the economy will stop its free-fall.  Now, that sounds like utopia to me.  Create credit and we will all be saved for unemployement, slowing production, decreased consumer spending, and rising interest rates.

HOLD ON… let’s put a toe back on the plane of reality…

Banks aren’t lending much more than before eventhough they are being handed gobs of cash.  Why wouldn’t banks lend out free money?

What if…

  1. there aren’t any borrowers worthy of getting loans? — Let’s say during a recession!  Oh right the economy slows WAY… DOWN.
  2. there are more troubled banks and unknowns on banks balance sheets.
  3. banks are holding the cash knowing full well that there is another storm on the horizon

I didn’t pull this out of thin air like the Fed does with money.  An article in the NY Times starts with

The banks aren’t lending. And despite what you have heard, they probably won’t start just yet.

Sorry Paulson your plan isn’t working.

“Our purpose is to increase confidence in our banks and increase the confidence of our banks, so that they will deploy, not hoard, their capital,” Mr. Paulson said in a statement Monday. “And we expect them to do so, as increased confidence will lead to increased lending. This increased lending will benefit the U.S. economy and the American people.

Of course, with a $250 billion injection into America’s biggest banks — not all of which were troubled — Mr. Paulson has a political sales job to do. And no requirements to lend were attached to the money. (Some banks may use the money to buy others.)

But Mr. Paulson is making a big assumption about confidence, because until the real economy recovers — which could take more than a year — lending to Main Street is unlikely to return rapidly to normal levels.

“It doesn’t matter how much Hank Paulson gives us,” said an influential senior official at a big bank that received money from the government, “no one is going to lend a nickel until the economy turns.” The official added: “Who are we going to lend money to?” before repeating an old saw about banking: “Only people who don’t need it.”

Again banks don’t want to lend into a very uncertain future.  They want confidence in the economy — there isn’t any and the opposite is occurring.  People are spending less as they become more concerned about the safety of their jobs.  Most Americans have no savings cushion to fall back on.

Roger Bootle and Jonathan Loynes of Capital Economics in London wrote a sobering note on Monday about the cash infusions into European banks that may apply here as well. “We expect rising loan defaults and further asset write-offs over the next couple of years to practically wipe out the governments’ capital injections, leaving banks back at square one,” they said. “Given that banks will need to increase their capital in order to expand their lending book, these measures on their own are unlikely to prevent bank lending from stagnating.”

Wait a minute… all that money being put into the system to restore confidence and spur lending may just vanish?  So at the end of the day more banks fail, the economy continues to contract, available credit continues to contract, unemployment rises, and interest rates eventually rise.  This isn’t what Paulson sold to us with his bailout plan.  Were we duped?

Nah, the individuals responsible for the government’s actions are always in need of votes and making a horrible situation look not so bad or at least feasible to fix.  At the end of the day our failed bailouts will have a disastrous effect.  The consequences are a HUGE debt burden, a larger interest payment on that debt, the world losing confidence in the value of the dollar, and a prolonged recession probably followed by major inflation.  I’ve been singing this song for a while and it will take time to play out, but as you can see this is a VERY rocky road.

CNBC says it perfectly

Posted on by
Reply

NASDAQ @ 2:43 pm

 

I have CNBC on in the background and between reading and watching the events unfold one of the anchors labeled the situation perfectly.

He essentially said that a close of 200 – 300 (in the DOW) points down won’t send a strong signal to everyone that there really is a crisis.  However, if the market closes down sharply then that will send the needed signal that something “MUST” be done.  We are being spoon fed a load of crap.  

This bill will probably eventually pass…  With the amount of panic and amount of “wealth” lost today I wonder if the level of support will start to shift from negative to positive.

CNBC is also saying that Barney Frank said that they were going to monitor the market’s reaction after the vote. So, lets go through the motions and see how the markets react to a no go on the bill and then if they freak out we can make sure it will pass on the second go around.

Anybody ever been to a musical, a play, or a performance of any kind?  Well, there are scenes and each is carefully planned out.  First you lay the ground work and setup the plot, then there is a climax, and a resolution.  I highly doubt we are even close to the climax, which means we have a long way to go laying the groundwork.

Probable Future Outlook for the United States

Posted on by
Reply

What concerns me most is looking at the highly probable future outlook…

The gov’t is looking to bail out the Freddie and Fannie (dependent upon congressional approval), which will help out new, but not existing home buyers. By adding their debt the gov’t is using our tax dollars and inflation adjusted dollars to secure them. However, we are projecting a $500 billion dollar short fall this year in the budget, and the national debt is at about 9.7 trillion, and growing ever so rapidly. If we tack on unfunded liabilities now we are talking anywhere from 50-70 trillion in obligations. Effectively the government is insolvent. Now what happens when the gov’t revenues begin to decline due to the slowing economy, baby boomers starting to take their retirements, baby boomers soon to be taking Medicare, and the continuation of the Iraq war / Afghan war / maybe Iran war?

I’m failing to see the light at the end of the tunnel.

Consumers purchased houses as money was cheap. Everyone felt rich so they purchased more consumables, which had no productive value. These weren’t investments into something that would have future economic value, but only immediate gratification and immediate depreciation. Look at who is producing and who is consuming… we in the USA are primarily guilty of the latter and it is all funded through the rest of the world’s savings. At some point the rest of the world is going to tire of this. Then after our HELOCs were maxed out we started to use our credit cards.

What happens if the United States dollar loses its status as the reserve currency? Then everyone with dollars will flood the markets and purchase any tangibles possible. Money is a commodity just like gold and silver, but it can easily be created. However, due to the nature of its existence it is a exchangeable commodity and considered legal tender. As people want dollars the price rises and as people desire them less the price falls. Why would anyone want dollars when you look at the future for the US economy besides necessity and political reasons.

People are already losing their HELOCs because banks are worried that consumers won’t be able to afford them. Legal or not this is happening. I also heard from a Real Estate agent in Seattle that banks are asking for 25% down on new mortgages.

In an earnings call in late January 2008, Bank of America executives said credit card delinquencies in California, Florida, Arizona, and Nevada—states with high foreclosure rates—increased five times as fast as in other states, suggesting that consumers struggling with their mortgage debt are also finding their credit card bills hard to pay. “We’re focused on getting paid for the risk we take,” said Joe Price, chief financial officer. – US News and World report 2/28/2008 — Link to the story

The GSE bailout will help to prolong the issues that the financial industry is facing. The USG will do everything in its power to support the system through its tax system. It also gives individuals and institutions more time to pull their money out of the dollar. An immediate collapse would make that very difficult and costly.

And Gary North just posted this lovely article that illustrates that nobody has a clue as to the extent of what is really going on. Link to the article Unfortunately this is for members only, which I highly recommend subscribing to. I don’t get paid a dime on referrals.

I’m getting the sense that things could get a whole lot worse than any of us imagine. In that case I’d consider moving out of the county. Sure the dollar is rallying, and commodities are falling, but how long will this last? Peak oil has passed so we are biding our time before demand outstrips supply. Without oil or with really expensive oil life becomes much more difficult. Panic would ensue in the streets.

For those of us who believe in the concept of revision to the mean take a look at the Case Schiller index since 1890. Looking at the graph we have never seen housing prices rise so dramatically so quickly. Every boom period was followed by a bust or contraction and revision to the mean. We are beyond the mean… we are in outer space. Thank you Fed for the cheap money, and for removing banking reserve restrictions, and inflating the money supply. Hey it had to go somewhere and housing seemed the place to be. Then it went to commodities, which are now taking a fall as well. However, I see no reason that the long term forecast for commodities won’t be higher. The commodities I speak of in this case are precious metals, petroleum, and food. Essentially all the necessities to keep the world moving.

As for housing it will have to come back down to reasonable values. If we encounter a period of hyperinflation then housing will be a good asset to hold onto. However, if we have a depression I could argue the opposite. In a depression the purchasing power of your dollar increases. Depression means contraction of the money supply, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing. In fact part of the Fed’s charter is to contract the money supply when needed, but that hasn’t been the case as of late.


Full Story from Mises.org

And what’s next? Commercial Real Estate?
NEW YORK: U.S. commercial real estate prices are likely to tumble over the next 12 to 18 months as more borrowers default on their loans and regulators crack down on banks, pushing even more properties onto the market. Since the market’s peak in 2007, the availability of debt – the lifeblood of commercial real estate – has dried up and choked off sales.

Borrowers have resisted selling because of falling prices. Banks have not sold off their troubled loans, fearing a huge write-down of all commercial real estate loans. But it looks as if the clock is running down. “We’re going to see a whole lot more trouble going forward,” said Peter Steier, vice president of Inland Mortgage Capital in New York.
Link to the article

It continues:

Commercial real estate sales in the United States are expected to fall 66 percent this year from $467 billion to an estimated $159 billion. This is because debt, especially securitized debt in the form of commercial mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS, is either unavailable or prices are too high and the terms too strict for borrowers, Reis said.

“One of our biggest problem areas is pretty much the state of Ohio,” said Kevin Donahue, senior vice president Midland Loan Services, a CMBS servicer that steps in when a loan is showing signs of imminent trouble. “If we keep going, by the second quarter of 2009, I think the entire state of Ohio will become a subsidiary of Midland.”

I discoved this last bit from Chris Martenson @ www.chrismartenson.com.

Noonan and Murphy on Palin

Posted on by
Reply

Well I’m trying to stay neutral with the whole Presidential election coming up.  Wow we actually get to “choose” another president.  Perhaps the VP of this Presidency won’t go hunting with his “friend” and mistake him for a duck.  Anyways, before I go off on a political rant I wanted to put up a quick post that found its way to my inbox via MoveOn.org. We have the pleasure of listening to John McCain’s former campaign chief Mike Murphy and former Reagan speechwriter Peggy Noonan discuss their “true” feelings on John McCain’s selection for VP.

 

-Aren’t politics fun!

 

 

[ad]