Tag Archives: real

Overextended…

Posted on by
Reply

… is exactly where the market was back in March when the S&P 500 hit 666.  Everyone thought the world was coming unhinged, and well it was and still is.  However, not everything comes tumbling down instantly.

With every play there are acts, and at some point the climax.  Without the climax how can we have resolution?  They are conditions dependant upon eachother unless we are speaking of the experimental genre.  With our money supply and government expendatures into the stratosphere we may be in the experimental, however let’s stick to the traditional for our discussion.

As this drama plays out I think we will have the main plot divided by smaller and yet smaller sub-plots each with their own climax and resolution.

While the market tops and is due for a correction we are jumping for joy at watching green shoots emerge from the abyss.  The media and figureheads talk about these shoots sprouting from here and there, but I don’t seem them.  Withered shoots perhaps.

Let’s introduce the buildup to the climax, and considering the climax euphoric the buildup sets the stage for euphoria.  In our case hope.  Beyond oversold conditions that we reaached in March we also had hit a stage of dénouement (catastrophy). However, this was only a subplot as if it had been the true bottom we would not have seen a short rebound in prices that have taken us up over 35%.  We needed complete disgust with the markets and an unwillingness to jump back in, which we didn’t see.

Instead will we go from Climax (the present) to catastrophe and back again I imagine a few more times before this is over.  We are fairily resiliant beings and can stand being pushed, pulled, and battered a bit before we completely throw in the towel.

image001

We are now starting a push into anxiety as the green shoot euphoria wears off.

Where are we going?
If the past is able to predicate the future, and if we are playing out subplots within the overall plot that leaves us with a theme of euphoria, despondency, optimisim and so on.  With despondency we will need to see disguist, lack of conviction in the government, and a swearing off the the financial markets. We aren’t even close.
Meanwhile as we go through these girations, while the Alt-A mortgages readjust, and commercial real estate weakens I’m expecting to see price fluxuations, and gyrations that flow with human emotion.  After all with so many players the markets are more emotion driven than anything else.

If the markets weren’t emotion driven then how can we explain people buying equities when the P/E ratio of the S&P500 is over 100, or how technical traders use patterns to profit?  After all we humans tend to do the same thing over and over again.  History repeats whether we like it or not.  The Romans clipped gold coins to fund increasing government expenditures, and in the modern era we print. Nothing has changed except the means in which it is accomplished with the same outcome.

*******

Short-Term:
A recovery in the dollar based on nothing more than everyone else is hurting perhaps worse than us, and it is very oversold.  Bernake and co might pull-in some liquidity to lessen foreigner’s fear of a devaluing dollar to support our debt markets.  This however, will undoubetly cause a collapse in the equity markets, commodities, and precious metals, while the dollar will rally as will bonds.

Winners: The US Dollar, Bonds
Losers: Everything else — Note: I’m cautious in shorting commodities due to when the next scenario will hit.

Intermediate-Term:
As liquidity is reduced Bernake will realize if he hasn’t already that there is no way out and that we will never be able to repay our debt.  The only way out will be a default via inflation, but that will prove futile once inflation hits 20%.  Wages will not rise and people will protest.  A depression will follow.

Winners: Precious Metals, Raw Commodities, Real Estate
Losers: Everything else

Longer-Term:
We will survive, and I hope we will change our ways to more responsible Americans.  The case for responsibility is huge as it has gone by the way side.  Instead of takeing care of ourselves, we look to others to make our decisions, pay for our health-care, take care of us in retirement, and essentially wipe our asses.  Fiscal responsibility needs… needs to happen.  No longer can we live off of debt that has we have no way of repaying.  I’m sorry, but a hummer purchased via your HELOC adds no value to your income.  Hence it is a poor investment and you must increase your earnings in other areas (no, housing doesn’t go up forever).
And here is our reset.  The New American emerging from the ashes. This is a ways out in time so we will revisit it as the cycle ticks on.

Congressional Budget Outlook :: CBO

Posted on by
Reply

Hold your hats folks as here are some of the forecasts for 2009 (link):

  • GDP falling by 2.2%
  • Slow recovery in 2010
  • > 9% unemployment by 2010
  • Decline in inflation (hmmmm… if monetary policy says anything this will reverse or at least eventually destroy the dollar)
  • Continued decline in housing prices
  • Decline in real consumption of more than 1%
  • Indeterminate on the financial system

And the best of all

$1.2 trillion dollar budget deficit for 2009*

*That doesn’t include the proposed stimulus package
*That amounts to 8.3% of GDP

So, we have an economy in decline, and digging a deeper and deeper hole to climb out of.  What I really want to know is how are we going to pay for 1) a 1.2T dollar deficit, and 2) a large fiscal stimulus package of a indeterminate size.

Let’s see our foreign friends have been purchasing our debt, which enabled us to essentially live off of their productive labor.  China for example is seeing a marjor reduction in exports, its economy is contracting, and eventually it is going to have to decide if it is worth supporting the American lifestyle at their own expense.  Presently, everyone is so intertwined I think there is a fear that if one jumps the house of cards falls down and we all lose.  However, is it possible for say China to pull out of the house of cards with minimal damage?  Is there a way they can reduce their exposure to US debt, and not have their savings collapse?  This is something I’d really like to know.

Seems to me that if they slowly shift some of their dollar reserves into commodities and other currencies SLOWLY, especially when there is increased demand they will be able to lessen their exposure.  The US import market is tanking, and has been tanking.  With unemployment increasing Bloomberg people are going to have a smaller income and will be forces to save thus hurting exporting countries.  This isn’t a US phenomena alone as Europe and frankly the rest of the world is contracting simultaneously, while being fed a mouthful of credit from central banks to re-inflate the bubble.  Last I checked it is very difficult to inflate a popped bubble.

Let’s take the latest number from Taiwan Bloomberg.  Their exports dropped by a record 41.9%.  We all know that Taiwan exports electronics, which have been a major boon ever since the technological revolution, which also saw a major hiccuup in 2000-2003.  So, this is confirmation of a major exporting taking a major hit.  There will be ramifications for the Taiwanese economy.

I can’t imagine that after the dust settles the world’s economies will look the same.  The sea of money will shift to where is sees the most opportunity and in its movement will tear apart the economies of many.

Here are a few more headlines on Bloomberg alone that tell a um telling story:

Fed Revives Discussion of Inflation Target to Counter Risk of Price Slide

ECB Expanded Balance Sheet by 36 Percent Last Year to Revive Bank Lending

Apartment Rents Fall, Vacancies Rise to Four-Year High on U.S. Job Losses

Shopping Center Vacancies in U.S. Approach 10-Year High as Stores Fail

Procter & Gamble Fights to Refinance as U.S. Borrowings Reach $2 Trillion

U.S. Banks Will Need to Raise More Cash in 2009, Meredith Whitney Writes

I’ll leave it at that, but what I’m seeing is RECESSION coupled with the Fed trying to stave it off through any means necessary, which is now including outright purchases of securities on the open markets.  Again we have no savings and are either monetizing debt or borrowing it from somewhere.  To do this will be disastrous to the dollar and our reputation as a solid financial center of the world.  Sure there are plenty of other economies in dire situations, but in the end who will come out with the heads up high and who will come out still in the sand?

Purgatory….

Posted on by
Reply

Ever watched a sci-fi movie where the crew goes into stasis while they travel from one end of the galaxy to the other?  Ever contemplated Purgatory where heaven and hell meet?  

I feel as though this is a period of semi-consciousness awaiting judgement…  Last night I was catching up on some news online when I was watching the futures markets turning deeper and deeper shades of red.  The morning was locked limit down and then we had an immediate spike — DOWN.  However, the day is turning out to be mild in comparison to what may have happened.  

The reason I label this as purgatory is because I think we are either going to swiftly swing in one direction or the other.  Emotion is in control at the moment and perhaps irrational.  Once the herd stampedes watch out.  If people want cash watch out markets.  As I said in a earlier post we haven’t really seen an exodus or pure panic yet.  

The news from around the world is to be expected given the size of the credit contraction.  

I think we may see a rally, perhaps not today, but maybe next week as people see bargains.  News will continue to be increasingly gloomy, spreading a shadow around the world.  The contraction will not abate and people in a moment of fear and panic will sell.  Hedge funds will continue to implode sending equity prices down further.  Mutual funds will have to begin liquidating.  The dollar will roar ahead.  

Only problem is that we have never seen such a huge monetary expansion. Once banks decide to start lending again that money they are now hoarding and using to purchase other banks will flow into the system.  Bam!!@! huge credit expansion at a completely unsustainable rate, and thus hyperinflation.  Equities may rebound, but given the recession they will probably be somewhat stagnant as the new capital investment will take time to be realized.  Meanwhile, gold, oil, and food will goto the moon as the dollar plummets.  Interest rates will also soar as the reality of our debt burden takes hold alongside major inflation.  People will want to be compensated for holding a worthless and bankrupt currency.  

My only real complaint with this prognostication is strength in the dollar.  I’m having a hard time comprehending or even believing that this dollar rally will continue.  It is a flawed currency, and has no basis for strength.  Then again what fiat currency really has any value?

 

my2cents

Banks are lending — NOT

Posted on by
Reply

The theory was beautiful (well in the abstract)…

Give troubled banks more credit and they will lend it out and the economy will stop its free-fall.  Now, that sounds like utopia to me.  Create credit and we will all be saved for unemployement, slowing production, decreased consumer spending, and rising interest rates.

HOLD ON… let’s put a toe back on the plane of reality…

Banks aren’t lending much more than before eventhough they are being handed gobs of cash.  Why wouldn’t banks lend out free money?

What if…

  1. there aren’t any borrowers worthy of getting loans? — Let’s say during a recession!  Oh right the economy slows WAY… DOWN.
  2. there are more troubled banks and unknowns on banks balance sheets.
  3. banks are holding the cash knowing full well that there is another storm on the horizon

I didn’t pull this out of thin air like the Fed does with money.  An article in the NY Times starts with

The banks aren’t lending. And despite what you have heard, they probably won’t start just yet.

Sorry Paulson your plan isn’t working.

“Our purpose is to increase confidence in our banks and increase the confidence of our banks, so that they will deploy, not hoard, their capital,” Mr. Paulson said in a statement Monday. “And we expect them to do so, as increased confidence will lead to increased lending. This increased lending will benefit the U.S. economy and the American people.

Of course, with a $250 billion injection into America’s biggest banks — not all of which were troubled — Mr. Paulson has a political sales job to do. And no requirements to lend were attached to the money. (Some banks may use the money to buy others.)

But Mr. Paulson is making a big assumption about confidence, because until the real economy recovers — which could take more than a year — lending to Main Street is unlikely to return rapidly to normal levels.

“It doesn’t matter how much Hank Paulson gives us,” said an influential senior official at a big bank that received money from the government, “no one is going to lend a nickel until the economy turns.” The official added: “Who are we going to lend money to?” before repeating an old saw about banking: “Only people who don’t need it.”

Again banks don’t want to lend into a very uncertain future.  They want confidence in the economy — there isn’t any and the opposite is occurring.  People are spending less as they become more concerned about the safety of their jobs.  Most Americans have no savings cushion to fall back on.

Roger Bootle and Jonathan Loynes of Capital Economics in London wrote a sobering note on Monday about the cash infusions into European banks that may apply here as well. “We expect rising loan defaults and further asset write-offs over the next couple of years to practically wipe out the governments’ capital injections, leaving banks back at square one,” they said. “Given that banks will need to increase their capital in order to expand their lending book, these measures on their own are unlikely to prevent bank lending from stagnating.”

Wait a minute… all that money being put into the system to restore confidence and spur lending may just vanish?  So at the end of the day more banks fail, the economy continues to contract, available credit continues to contract, unemployment rises, and interest rates eventually rise.  This isn’t what Paulson sold to us with his bailout plan.  Were we duped?

Nah, the individuals responsible for the government’s actions are always in need of votes and making a horrible situation look not so bad or at least feasible to fix.  At the end of the day our failed bailouts will have a disastrous effect.  The consequences are a HUGE debt burden, a larger interest payment on that debt, the world losing confidence in the value of the dollar, and a prolonged recession probably followed by major inflation.  I’ve been singing this song for a while and it will take time to play out, but as you can see this is a VERY rocky road.

Another bailout, more credit… when will we learn?

Posted on by
Reply

It seems that the tune to march to these days is credit o credit we need more credit.  Somehow somewhere we forgot quite quickly that credit got us into this mess.  If credit is expanding much faster than real economic growth the outcome will be instability in the economy.  That is like an individual taking on more debt while their income stays steady or worse is in decline.  At some point in the future the debt will become unmanageable.  Once debt is too great a burden that individual is going to have to either sell assets to pay off the debt, declare bankruptcy, increase their income, or default.  The one thing that makes the government lucky or so it seems is that they can increase “income” through inflating the money supply event hough it is really illusionary.  All they have done is take money from every taxpayer to service the ever growing debt burden.

I find it distressing that Bernake and Co. are talking about further fiscal stimulus to the tune of $150 billion dollars and Democrats want double that.  We are already over $1 trillion in debt for this year.  Where o where are we to find this money?  Perhaps a leprechaun will appear beneath the rainbow and we will be saved.  If the politicians and bureaucrats have their way this is exactly what will happen.  

American’s have no or very little savings to invest in capital goods.  We are laden in debt and attempting to service that debt.  If unemployment rises substantially then servicing that debt will become even more burdensome.  Another stimulus package will probably be used to payoff existing debt, which does nothing for stimulating growth.

So, what do we do…  Many have proposed various solutions.  

Why not reduce the size of the government for one. 
– Yes, people will lose their jobs.  However, with time they will find other jobs as that money can now be used for other things.

Reduce taxes, and the size of the tax code.
 —  Our tax code is way to complicated and confusing.  I would love to know the cumulative hours wasted on tax returns every year by companies and individuals.  Imagine if we had a flat tax of 10-15%…  get rid of tax incentives, credits, exemptions, etc…  Not everyone is going to be happy about it, but a reduction in the tax burden in actual numbers and time would enable people to use their money elsewhere and as they choose versus having someone decide for them where to best put it to use.   

Return our currency to one backed by a physical commodity — GOLD and SILVER
 — The government would hate this, but it would eliminate the major booms and busts and enable constant growth.  Money would again have a true value versus the value instilled by the gov’t.  Money’s value would be returned to the people and taken away from the money printers, and confiscators of our savings.

Bring our troops home
 — We don’t need to be the world’s police.  Occupying over 140 countries is absurd and very costly.  I agree that we need to have an army to defend the country, but it needs to be defensive and not offensive.  Our paws are in too many honey jars.  We are bound to piss off the bees, which we are continually doing and then blame them for getting upset at us.  Ironic don’t you think.

Remove all subsidies and tariffs
 — All they do is distort the market place and what people produce.  For example why do we have corn syrup in our soda, but in the rest of the world they use sugar?  Corn is highly subsidized, while sugar has many tariffs on it.  Corn Syrup is cheaper due to government policy.  Corn farmers love this, while it hurts all of us.  We pay for those subsidies, and also pay high sugar prices.

I’m going to leave it at that, but there are plenty more options.  People say that ignorance is bliss.  NO it isn’t bliss it is being LAZY.  Will you get out of a parking ticket or a speeding ticket if you claim ignorance?  Not unless you are really smooth with words.  

What happened to being responsible? If you take on too much debt then you have a problem.  American’s have a virus, and it is contagious.  We live beyond our means, and then when we get in trouble someone bails us out at the cost of everyone.  The one’s who really pay are the responsible ones who are living within their means.

Copperfield & Houdini for Presidency!

Posted on by
Reply

I’ve attended a few performances by David Copperfield and he has performed the unbelievable.  Before my very own eyes a group of thirty people vanished into thin air.  Where did they go?  I watched the unbelievable made real right in front of me.  How could this be an illusion created to fool me into belief?  I ask you… HOW?

David Copperfield and Harry Houdini would probably be a better pair to run the government at this point.  At least they would give us a good show.  The current officials in office make my gut wrench.  We have migrated from the land of the free to nationalization of private property in the name of free markets.  Whoa… okay let’s get something straight.  WE DO NOT HAVE FREE MARKETS… NOT EVEN CLOSE  

If we actually had a system that represented free markets the Federal Reserve (a PRIVATE bank made up of member banks that are also PRIVATE) would not exist, we would still be on the gold standard, and the government wouldn’t even consider a bailout of the taxpayer’s funding, and the United States Treasury would not be proposing this amazing relief package for those who are mainly responsible for getting us into this mess.  

So, I mentioned two masters of illusion… Why?  What is being pulled off at the moment is happening in front of our eyes and for some like me is atrocious.  However, for others they think it is essential to the integrity of financial markets, financial institutions, and YOUR house.  The entire bailout is being purported as a bailout for the helpless homeowner, the saver, the middle class.  

The problem is that nobody knows how much any of this debt is actually worth.  Say the government buys $700,000,000,000,000.00 worth of debt at $0.20 on the dollar, which is great discount.  If that debt is in reality worth less than that we have a problem.  When will these notes be paid back, and in what form are the notes?  

Chris Martenson managed to grab part of an article that later disappeared from Bloomberg that said:

“The Treasury’s thinking is to make it as big and wide as possible so they have the flexibility to act if need be,” said Shane Oliver, Sydney-based head of investment strategy at AMP Capital Investors, which manages about $108 billion. “There have been losses on a whole range of U.S. debts and as the economy deteriorates in response to the housing slump those losses could escalate.” 

Treasury officials now propose buying what they term troubled assets, without specifying the type, according to a document obtained by Bloomberg News and confirmed by a congressional aide.

This effectively means any type of debt.  Let’s take a moment to see what forms of debt exist:

  • Credit Card DEBT
  • Mortgage DEBT
  • Automobile DEBT
  • Bond DEBT

………. and the list goes on ………….

So, we have the United States government wanting to take on all this debt in the name of saving the financial markets.  Let’s just take the debt from the banks to clear up their balance sheets so they don’t have to write it off, which would cause them to have to increase their reserves because their assets are now below the minimum.  We could lower that further, but it has already been lowered to 3% of total assets.  That means they most likely loaned out the other 97%.  

As the Fed creates money our dollar is worth less and less.  Where is the Federal Government going to come up with $700 Billion dollars?  They will create it from nothing, which the Federal Reserve is great at doing.  Inflation will not solve the problem, only exacerbate it.  Newt Gingrich opposes it, and admits that if he is wrong in not supporting it that it is the lesser of two evils.  

If this bill passes please say goodbye to the dollar as we know it.  Foreigners might finally reach the breaking point to where they are afraid to purchase dollars and realize that buying them to keep their currency less expensive is futile.

You just purchased AIG… Did you have a choice?

Posted on by
Reply

The Fed is Heralded as a savior.  

 

 

 

I’d like to present a dissenting opinion and it will only take a moment.  The Fed is a quasi-governmental entity — read private bank.  It is a very large private bank that oversees the money flows between banks with the exclusive privilege of creating and destroying money granted per the United States government.  I don’t know when the destroying of money has actually ever occurred since 1913 when the Fed was created.  

Tomorrow (9/17/2008) will be a grand day for the markets as they celebrate the saving of AIG, which if left alone would have hurt a many people and companies.  In the long run it would have been better for everyone and helped people realize that the income’s of taxpayers aren’t for sale <pillaging> if they were left to fail.  It would also have prevented a precedent from being created that the Fed can and will purchase anyone if need or desire be.

However, the Fed is able to say they are “rescuing” AIG, Freddie, and Fannie all in a very short period.  Here is a thought to ponder…

If I am able to create money out of nothing or thin air then why wouldn’t I want to seem like a savior and help out distressed companies in the name of helping the economy?  I don’t have a great answer why I wouldn’t.  If I can shave a few cents off of everyone’s dollar who will notice?  At first it won’t be apparent, but eventually there will be consequences, and at the end of the day I will be the savior.  The consequences won’t be traced back to me.  Like committing a crime knowing you won’t be caught… do you commit the crime?

Revisiting the notion of buying low (through fictitious money that is treated as real money)… I’m the Fed and create $85 billion dollars to purchase 80% of AIG.  Great so now I own 80% of its liabilities and assets. No, not so great because nobody knows what the actual value of the assets are. <Remember I can create money>  For someone who can’t create money this is a problem, and the exact problem AIG ran into.  However, with the ability to create money I can now continue to add more “cash” to AIG’s balance sheet helping it though the crisis.  At the end of the day AIG, Freddie, or Fannie have been saved all though Monopoly money.  They will once again be players in the “free market”, but purchased at a unbelievably low cost. FREE  

Conclusion:  You and I purchased AIG, Fannie, and Freddie… however we will never see a dime of profit in return.  Do you see a problem with this?  Yet, the Fed will be treated like a king for saving the financial markets.  Perhaps the right thing to say would be using someone else’s money to purchase a failing company and then profiting without ever returning that money to the “lender”.  

That is Default. Fraud. Theft. Robbery. 

Final thought:

Do you think that income taxes are legal and necessary according to the constitution of the United States?